Saturday, June 2, 2012

‘BETTER CONFEDERATES DID NOT LIVE’

          The topic of black Confederate soldiers is rarely talked about, nowadays, because it's not ‘politically correct’, but the truth of the matter is that quite a number of black Southerners served in the Confederate Army, and way before Mr. Lincoln ever let the first black man fight for his beloved Union. The contributions that Black Southerners made to support the South in its struggle for independence should not be denigrated.
Why would a black man fight to protect slavery, you ask. It wasn’t for slavery that he fought. Black Southerners fought for the same reason that they defended the United States colonies during the Revolutionary War; they fought because their homes were being invaded. This was their country. They fought to protect their homes, their families, their neighbors, and, quite frankly, the only life they knew.
          It is impossible to know exactly how many black soldiers served the Confederacy during the War for Southern Independence, but it has been estimated that between 50,000 - 90,000 Southern Negroes, both slave and free black, served in the Confederate ranks, with over 13,000 of these men having seen actual combat.
          Although it was late in the War before the Confederate Government finally approved for blacks to be officially enlisted as soldiers, in ‘the ranks’ it was a much different story. Many Confederate officers frequently enlisted blacks with the simple criteria of “Will you fight?” And fight, they did!

‘Uncle’ Jeff Shields, General Thomas
‘Stonewall’ Jackson's Negro bodyguard
          During the first major battle of the War, the 1st Battle of Manassas (that’s 1st Battle of Bull Run to any Yankees readin’ this), Black Confederates were in the thickest of the fightin’, shocking the Northern soldiers who went up against them, and later, 3,000+ Black Confederates were serving under General ‘Stonewall’ Jackson, during his famous Valley Campaign of 1862.
And when the folks down around Macon, Georgia, heard that the Yankee Army had burned Atlanta and was now comin' out the other side destroying everything in its path, some of the colored men there asked their white mistresses for permission to form what the white folks called a militia, as they had heard that General Sherman was killin' and burnin' everything in his path - killin women and children, colored and white alike. As most of their men were off fightin’ in the War, the ladies readily gave their consent, and preparations were hurriedly made.
Armed with such weapons as could be rounded up, from old revolutionary muskets left behind to machetes, pitchforks, and even clubs, and flying a Confederate Battle Flag made up of old rags dyed and sewn together, the 300-colored men marched out to meet the Yankee devils.
Under General Pleasant J. Phillips, they and other militia troops met the Union Army, approximately seven miles east of Macon, near the small hamlet of Griswoldville, where there was a Confederate pistol factory and other mills. A day-long battle ensued, and the relatively inexperienced Confederate militia made seven ill-fated charges, through withering fire, upon a fortified position manned by veteran Union soldiers armed with the new Spencer repeating rifle. The battle ended at sundown when the Southerners retired from the battlefield. The Confederates lost more than 1100-men dead, wounded, or captured.

Louis Napoleon Winbush, seen here @ the
1932 Confederate Reunion, rode with Gen. Forrest
during the War Between the States

Of the 300-Black Confederates that marched off that day to meet the Yankee invader, only three of those men made it back. Theirs was the only major opposition to General Sherman's infamous March to the Sea.
          Even General Nathan Bedford Forrest, ex-slave trader and plantation owner, had 65-Black Confederates voluntarily serving in his legendary cavalry troop, bedeviling the Yankees all across Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. After the war, he said of the black men who served under him, "These boys stayed with me… and better Confederates did not live."
          And when General Robert E. Lee finally surrendered at Appomattox, in April of 1865, dozens of Black Confederates were present amongst the ranks of the infamous ‘Army of Northern Virginia’.
          So, don’t think for a minute that the storied battlefield successes of any of the above-mentioned Confederate units would have been possible without the support of these loyal black Southerners.
          Now, some folks want to point out that more black soldiers fought for the North than did for the South, which is true. But, what they don’t tell you is how the North forcibly conscripted blacks, both free blacks and slaves, as they came upon them in occupied territories, giving them no choice whatsoever.
            In February of 1865, Union General Ulysses S. Grant (a slave owner, himself) ordered the capture of “all the Negro men… before the enemy can put them in their ranks.” He feared that black Southerners would take up arms for the Confederacy.
The order spread universal confusion and terror among the Negroes, and they fled to the woods and swamps. They were hunted to their hiding places by the Yankee soldiers, and the men and young boys were seized and forced to enlist. Many of the men had large families of young children dependent upon them for support. Their crops and domestic animals were stolen or destroyed, and their women were held as the legitimate prey of lust. Husbands and wives, children and parents, were separated; some to never see one another again. So much for the Union Army being the emancipators of the enslaved and oppressed black man.
More than 40 black Southern men attended the 1890 Alabama Confederate Veterans Reunion

After the War ended, the Southern people did not forget their black comrades-in-arms, either. For the 50th Anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, in 1913, arrangements were made for a joint reunion of Union and Confederate veterans. The Commission in charge of the event made sure that there were enough accommodations for the black Union veterans, but was completely surprised when unexpected Black Confederates arrived. The white Confederate veterans immediately welcomed their old comrades, gave them one of their own tents, and saw to their every need. Nearly every Confederate Reunion held after the War included those blacks that served with them, still proudly wearing the gray.
The descendants of those Black Confederates now live all across the United States – north, south, east, and west - and have a right to be proud of their ancestor's service to the South. Truly…“better Confederates did not live."


11 comments:

  1. Your blog is a success, Barry. Thank you for relating the facts about this touchy subject.

    Phil Key
    Fenton, MO

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slaves_and_the_American_Civil_War#Blacks_in_the_Confederate_Army

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The above referenced link covers the Confederate Army, but not the respective State troops, which were an entirely different critter. Besides enlisting, most slaves were taken to war as soldier's servants, and time and again, it's recorded in their own words in official slave narratives from the 1930's that many took part in the fighting, if only occasionally. Why? Who can say? Maybe, for no other reason than habitual loyalty to their master. After the War, many Southern states (not the Federal government) provided pensions to those former slaves that served as 'Soldier's Servants'. Not to be quarrelsome, I kindly suggest you do more in-depth historical research that Wikipedia. Thank you for your interest in my blog, and I hope you have a pleasant day.

      Delete
    2. An interesting article in Wikipedia. Unfortunately Wikipedia is not scholarly. It has the ability to be changed(edited)by anyone. Better sources include Black Southerners in Confederate Armies by J.H. Segars and Charles Kelly Barrow. A second source which is also one of my favorites is Forgotten Confederates An Anthology About Black Southerners again by Charles Kelly Barrow, J.H. Segars, and R.B. Rosenberg.

      Delete
  3. Most Southern slave owners deluded themselves that their slaves loved them and would never leave. The second Union soldiers approached slaves flocked to them. The South seceded to preserve slavery. This is an undeniable fact. You can embrace your lost cause mythology all you want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While it's certainly true that one of the issues was the preservation of slavery for the time being, it wasn't primary to secession. In fact if you take the time to read the Confederate constitution, you'll see it prohibits further importation of slaves. It's also been documented that less than 10% of Southerners had slaves. Most were so poor, they could barely afford to buy shoes, much less purchase a slave or the upkeep of a slave. The culture that made slavery viable, was coming to an end with or without the war. Mechanization was more efficient and more cost effective. That alone would have effectively eliminated the use of most slaves on farms and plantations.

      Delete
  4. Actually, my 3rd-great-grandfather's family's slaves stayed on after the War, & then two of their families actually moved from Mississippi to Texas with his family in the 1890's, living next door to them for decades. I have the documentation. So, I suggest, sir, you might ought to open your eyes to the fact that, not all, but some slaves were actually closer to their former owners than you've been told. Narrow-mindedness is akin to ignorance, Friend, so open your eyes to all of the possibilities. Thank you for your interest in my blog, and I hope you have a pleasant day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My family had slaves too and they stayed. I am sick to death of the current narrative that seeks to rewrite history. The statue removal disgusts me to no end and this entire wave of trying to sterilize the landscape is appalling. I recently saw an article where the author was upset "Gone with the Wind" and the "King and I" were being played at the Orpheus theater in Memphis. There was a radio story about how people are offended at Gilbert and Sullivan's Madam Butterfly. All these attempts at defacing, rewriting and eliminating cultural and intellectual history are insulting and enraging. The current slaps at the Confederacy does no less than demand that we southerners feel shame and remorse towards our own culture and relatives, in essence, ashamed of who we are. The current narrative of anti-confederate sentiment is going to really breed resentment against people who clamor for the public removal of culture.

    One of the previous writers is absolutely right in that a principle reason people fought in the south was because people up north with guns were coming to our homes and neighbors to burn loot and upset everyone's life. It's absurd to think we wouldn't organize to stop it. You don't hear this discussed. Soldiers and sailors in every war fight for their fellow soldiers, e.g. Each other. That is true of the south. How many combatants owned slaves? You think a man who doesn't own slaves cares about the idea of owning slaves is more important than fighting against direct threats against family and neighbor? You think US Marines were fighting against the idea of the East Asia Co- prosperity sphere of the Japanese, the liberation of China, Burma, Thailand, etc rather than fighting for fellow Marines?

    People fight for each other, family and neighbors. What questions DO need to be asked are why, after untold billions spend, laws passed and social upheaval endured, these same critics have not advanced in society. Just ask the Chinese "Coolies" who endured murder and legal discrimination about their experiences, The Irish, I'm 34%, who were badly discriminated against and referred to as murderous apes and niggers turned inside out, or Germans, or Jews, or any group you want. They suffered, moved on and adapted and thrived. So where is the disconnect here. Ask liberal academics and policy makers and they fall silent and shift uneasily and cannot give an answer. Ask why true Africans that have emigrated in the last few decades cannot stand many American blacks...who promptly return the favor.

    Yeah...life is hard and it isn't fair, never has been...just ask 6 million Jews about that, or 900,000 Rwandans, or thousands of Bosnians. I've heard the term genocide used about slavery and that cheapens the term. A genocide attempts to exterminate...utterly...an identifiable group in whole or in part. What group are blacks? What system ties up tens of thousands of dollars in each person only to murder them. No system does. They are commodities, extremely expensive and valuable commodities upon which the tiny few owners had their entire fortunes dependent...it's understandable why they fought the north. Lose the slaves, all their money is gone. But that sure as hell isnt genocide, ethnic cleansing or any other system remotely like that. No one pays the equivalent $50,000 for one man just to put a bullet through his head (except in movies like the purge).

    All of this social reconstruction is one giant session of cultural destruction to make people feel better about themselves. No social, economic or intellectual progress as a group, go to the old standby, beat up in the civil war culture by waving the bloody banner. If this revisionism and santization is what it takes for people to feel better about themselves, then that only exposes just how deep the rot and emptiness is, because Southerners know their heritage, culture and family and have nothing to be ashamed of.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't have a problem w/ the truth. But, the truth can be spun, depending on the bias of the spinner. I'm wondering what your stance is, Mr. Jennings on interracial interaction and relationships, and how comfortable you would be if your own children or members of your family mixed w/ other races, especially "black". Your answer would help me to determine the credibility of this "truth".

    ReplyDelete